On October 22nd, the Boston Herald published an editorial endorsing a NO vote on Question 2 on November 6th. Their editorial highlights two of the significant flaws in Question 2: the lack of a requirement for a patient to receive a psychiatric consult before receiving the lethal prescription, and the inability of doctors to accurately predict a six-month prognosis, arguing, “such an estimate of life expectancy could easily be wrong.”
The Boston Herald, “recommends voting NO,” as do we. On November 6th make your voices heard and vote NO on Question 2.
You can view the editorial here. Please share it with your friends and family.